DACA and the Bible: 3 principles

Saturday, February 24, 2024

Site Search

Current events

DACA and the Bible: 3 principles

September 7, 2017 -

The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA) is an executive order issued by President Obama in 2012 that grants temporary legal status to those brought to the US as children. According to government figures, 787,580 people (known as “Dreamers”) have been approved for the program.

They have been able to obtain driver’s licenses, enroll in college, and secure jobs. They also pay income taxes. The program doesn’t give them a path to become US citizens or even legal permanent residents. But they can apply to defer deportation and legally reside in the US for two years. Then they can apply for renewal. Nearly 800,000 renewals have been approved since the program began.

On Tuesday, the Trump administration announced that it would rescind the program in six months unless Congress and the president enact a law reviving it. The president believes that such legislation should originate with Congress, not the White House. Officials will no longer accept new applicants to the program, but protections for current DACA recipients remain in effect.

Two-thirds of American evangelicals favor giving work permits to Dreamers, while only 22 percent oppose such permits. Fifty-seven percent of evangelicals believe DACA recipients should be allowed to become citizens; 15 percent believe they should be allowed to become legal residents but not citizens; and 19 percent believe they should be deported.

How should we think biblically about this divisive issue? Three principles in Scripture are relative to the debate.

One: We should care for immigrants.

Scripture is clear: “You shall not wrong a sojourner or oppress him, for you were sojourners in the land of Egypt” (Exodus 22:21). Should our immigrants not receive compassion and support, especially if they are children brought into our country through no decision of their own?

Two: We should uphold the rule of law.

Scripture teaches, “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities” (Romans 13:1). Border security is a biblical priority (Proverbs 22:28; 23:10; Deuteronomy 32:8). While the Dreamers did not choose to come to America illegally, their parents made this decision for them. Does granting them citizenship reward the illegal actions of their parents?

Three: Children are not to be punished for the sins of their parents.

Ezekiel 18:20 states, “The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father.” Is it fair for us to deport the Dreamers for breaking immigration laws they did not choose to violate?

You can see why this is such a challenging dilemma. We should not reward the illegal actions of the parents of Dreamers, but we should not punish children for their parents’ acts.

A middle approach relevant to this debate was proposed by President George W. Bush in 2004. He specified that illegal immigrants would pay a fee to enter “temporary worker status.” Such a person could apply for citizenship but would be placed in line behind those who have already begun this process. Such a compromise could serve both Dreamers and the rule of law.

Of course, our ultimate biblical responsibility to Dreamers is to share God’s dream with them. Our Father “desires all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth” (1 Timothy 2:4). No matter how people come to America, he wants them to come to Christ.

NOTE: To read my latest website article, Travelers fleeing Irma complain about airfares, click here.

What did you think of this article?

If what you’ve just read inspired, challenged, or encouraged you today, or if you have further questions or general feedback, please share your thoughts with us.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Denison Forum
17304 Preston Rd, Suite 1060
Dallas, TX 75252-5618
[email protected]