Home > Cultural Commentary > Rush Limbaugh's apology

Janet's Blog

  • Are we ignoring the signs?

    Are we ignoring the signs? I don't put a lot of stock in the preachers that stand on street corners and announce the world is coming to an end.  I think when the world is coming to an end - God will do the announcing. […]

    Read more...

Radical Islam: What You Need to Know


Radical Islam: What You Need to Know by Dr. Jim Denison

Why do radical Muslims hate us? How will the death of bin Laden affect this global conflict? What will it take to win the longest war in America’s history?

Jim Denison explains the mind and motives of radical Islam, telling you what you need to know about the greatest threat our nation has ever faced.

Read a chapter

Download the white paper

Buy the book from ChristianBook.com

Buy the eBook
iBookstore Kindle Nook

Radio show host Rush Limbaugh speaks at a forum hosted by the Heritage Foundation, on the similarities between the war on terrorism and the television show 24 in Washington June 23 2006 (Credit: Reuters/Micah Walter)Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke testified before the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee on February 23.  In her comments she supported the Obama Administration's mandate that religiously-affiliated institutions must provide funding for contraception.  That mandate has since been modified, but is still controversial.

Even more controversial is the firestorm set off by Rush Limbaugh six days after Ms. Fluke's testimony.  The talk show host made comments about her that are still headlining the news this morning.  I will not repeat them here, as they are highly pejorative and sexually suggestive.  Rick Santorum called them "absurd", while Mitt Romney said, "it's not the language I would have used."  House minority leader Eric Cantor described them as "insulting".

After defending his statements for several days, Limbaugh apologized for them over the weekend, saying his "choice of words was not the best, and in the attempt to be humorous, I created a national stir."  Despite his apology, a seventh advertiser has now pulled its ads from his show.  Yesterday, Ron Paul said of Limbaugh's apology, "He's doing it because some people were taking their advertisements off of his program.  It was his bottom line he was concerned about.  I don't think he's very apologetic."

I don't know if Rush Limbaugh was sincere or not, but I do know that my words and my attitudes are sometimes not the same.  This convicting fact was made clear to me over the weekend as I read Stanley Grenz's masterful work on Christian ethics, The Moral Quest.  Grenz makes this statement: "Jesus knew that inward piety and not outward conformity to the law marks true obedience to God, because God's intent focused on establishing right relationships."

When I read that assertion, a simple but significant insight struck me: I can act holy without being holy, but I cannot be holy without acting holy.  God wants my internal life to be godly because it is the source of all external actions.  By contrast, Satan tempts me in my thoughts and attitudes because he knows that such sins will inevitably reveal themselves in my actions and witness.  This fact explains Jesus' consistent emphasis on internal godliness--anger is as sinful as murder (Matthew 5:22) and lust is adultery (v. 28; see Mark 7:21-23).  Our culture measures spirituality by our actions; Jesus measures it by our attitudes.

How do we do the right thing for the right reason today?  Before Israel entered their Promised Land, Moses told them, "When you go to war against your enemies and see horses and chariots and an army greater than yours, do not be afraid of them, because the Lord your God, who brought you up out of Egypt, will be with you" (Deuteronomy 20:1).  If we want what is right, no matter the cost, God will help us do what is right.  So I'm praying for a godly heart this morning, in the confidence that godly actions will follow.  Will you join me?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments  

 
-1 # Tracey Bedgood 2012-03-05 08:47
I understand your point about the heart. Could you spend time on why the government (my tax dollars) should pay for contraception to support someone's sex life? She is not married. That to me is more controversial than whether or not Rush's apology was sincere. I am more upset about that than Rush demonstrating absurdity by being absurd.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
+1 # Joan 2012-03-05 08:53
I think Rush is yet another character that shows "pride goeth before the fall". He has been shooting from the hip too long. Ashame as he is probably a smart man who doesn't know how to use his words wisely. He has so much passion it is ashame he can't communicate more constructively with that passion.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
+1 # Sam Dennis 2012-03-05 09:09
"I cannot be holy without acting holy." Well said, Jim. Likewise Paul said, "put off the old man and put on the new." We Christians would do well to remember that instruction, both in these days of media overkill and in a Monday morning commute.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
+3 # Ira A 2012-03-05 09:26
Great reminder of what matters most to God. The attitude of our heart is what God judges and the acts of our hands.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
+2 # Dick B 2012-03-05 10:00
One of the things that Rush and others were making fun of was this single woman's statement "Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school." At $1 per contraception-prevention device at CVS, such a woman must be having sex an average of 2.7 times a day. Not only is the speaker asking society to condone her promiscuity, but to support it financially. Rush may have picked the wrong word to describe this left-wing activist, but her words were insulting to taxpayers and common decency.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
0 # David M. Kennedy 2012-03-05 11:07
It is important that Christians speak out when something happens like happened with Rush's statement. Silence by Christians when a hatemonger like Rush says what he does, is seen as tacit approval by Christians of his statements and conduct. We can't have it both ways. Our leaders have hitched our faith to people like Rush and our faith pays the price.

I am not surprised to see rebukes from the GOP faithful that are lukewarm at best, as their political livelihood demands their cowardice. But anything less than an all-out condemnation from Christian leaders and faithful is disheartening and merely confirms to the public masses that our faith is likewise beholden to political extremism.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
+1 # Cgreen 2012-03-21 16:44
Rush is not a hatemonger. Rush is a talking head who spends tens of thousands of hours talking publicly of his political opinions. I think most Christians, and certainly most conservative Christians, agree with most of his politcal positions. His style includes ridicule of his opponents through humor and every now and then (like the Sandra Fluke episode) he says something really stupid that ends up detracting from his poltical message. His comments re Fluke were obviously inappropriate, he knows it and the public knows it. I for one hope Rush keeps on talking - appropriately - because the secular left won't let up (the devil never sleeps) and their goals of "fundamental change" include putting Christians in their place.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
-1 # Myrtle Anderson 2012-03-06 08:42
Rush is a fool and an [*****]. He should be vbanned from public T.V. and all of his supporters should get rid of him. How could you let such a low life be onpublic T.V. He should be in slime with the pigs, for the slime ball he is.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
+1 # Joyce Cummings 2012-03-06 18:04
I was really disappointed in you regarding Rush. He was right about the point---Obama is doing something that's unconstitutional and Rush was pointing that out. How would like it if the federal government said to Park Cities Baptist that you must pay for contraception for all your employees? Joyce a loyal reader in D
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
-1 # Sue Thompson 2012-03-06 19:02
Tracy and Dick, I believe that just over half of birth control medicine or contraceptives are used by women for purposes other than birth control. I heard Ms. Fluke's testimony about her friend who needed it for cancer prevention. I had a friend who used it for similar purposes. Although my friend died, she had a chance at life by using the birth control. Talking about "tax dollars supporting someone's sex life" and "condoning promiscuity" in my opinion indicates a lack of a full understanding of issues involved and an incorrect judgment of many who use birth control medication. I am a very committed, born again Christian and I must say that too often some Christians seem to have a very simplistic and uninformed view of political and social issues. Trust me, you will pay much more in tax dollars by being required to pay for emergency room treatment of illness which could have been prevented had the persons given free health coverage or some access to cheaper health insurance than is now available. By the way, holiness involves respecting the rights of others, loving others, and having a concern for those who are less fortunate than we are--traits of the holiness of Jesus.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment

We welcome your thoughts, but please do not use profanity, obscenities, abusive language, or otherwise off-topic/ objectionable content. Remember, this is a public forum. Do not post personal information including phone numbers, email and mailing addresses in the body of your comment. All comments are subject to moderation and may be removed. Repeat offenders may lose commenting privileges. We will not use the name and email that you provide for marketing purposes.

Security code
Refresh